Appendix 2

WRV Logo

USDA Agricultural Research Service
Water Research Vision 2050 Feedback Workshop

ARS developed the USDA Water Research Vision by conducting a facilitated year-long, virtual workshop with nearly 40 ARS scientists from nearly all U.S. regions and water science related disciplines. Participants spanned early to senior level career ARS scientists, with special attention paid to diversity. This extended workshop was followed by several months of writing and synthesis from which the above vision was composed. A facilitated 3-day workshop garnered feedback from partners and stakeholders, including Federal and State agencies, policymakers, and commodity groups.



ARS scientists shared an overview presentation on the Water Resource Vision 2050 which was followed by participants engaging in three separate breakout sessions to discuss six sections of the vision document. The goals of this workshop were to elicit input and feedback on the Water Resource Vision 2050 and for participants to explore potential alignments and mutual interests, to ask questions, and to consider gaps in the vision document. Participants were also invited to review the Water Resource Vision 2050 document and provide specific written comments over the next week.



Participants were asked to engage in four rounds of randomly selected, small group conversations exploring what are the collaborative opportunities and what will help ARS get there by considering these three questions?

1. What’s possible? Where is collaboration possible in water research? What scientific questions can you help each other understand better?

2. What are the risks and rewards of collaborating on water research?

3. What’s needed to do this well? What will strengthen multi-agency, cross-discipline scientific collaboration? Who are the missing stakeholders? Voices? Perspectives? How do we engage with them? 


The fourth round was designed to produce specific topic questions for discussion on Day 3. Specifically, participants were asked to consider what themes or patterns were they noticing? They were also asked to identify their top three topics or questions that should be explored further.



Topic areas from Day 2 conversations were organized into two sessions, and participants self-sorted into their topic of interest in each session. The questions considered on Day 3 were grouped into five general areas: important and emerging water issues, collaborations, incentives, challenges, and big data. Common themes emerged when examining the comments from all categories together: communication, active engagement with all parties affected, support of underserved communities, engagement of early career scientists, and project support from data management and basic administration to challenges in addressing agency requirements.






Federal Agencies

Executive Office: Council on Environmental Quality
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
National Science Foundation (NSF)
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention
United States Department of Agriculture
     Agricultural Research Service (ARS)
     Economic Research Service (ERS)
     Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS)
     Forest Service (FS)
     National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)
     National Climate Hub Office
     National Institute for Food and Agriculture (NIFA)
     Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
     Office of the Chief Economist
     Office of the Secretary
United States Department of the Energy (DoE)
United States Department of the Interior
Bureau of Reclamation
United States Geological Survey (USGS)
United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA)
United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA)
United States Trade and Development Agency


National Research Laboratories
Lawrence Berkley Laboratories
Pacific Northwest National Lab


Colleges and Universities
College of the Muscogee Nation
Colorado State University
Kansas State University
Michigan State University
New Mexico State University
Texas A&M University
University of California at Irvine
University of Cincinnati

Colorado Agricultural Water Alliance
Field to Market
Lower Mississippi River Sub-basin Committee on Hypoxia
New Mexico Department of Agriculture
Upper Mississippi Basin River Association